Marti wrote:
May I ask, RSM ~ when you speak of 'faith merchants' who want to stir up wild emotions, what kind of person do you mean?
Also, if faith is a peaceful acceptance of reality, in what, or in whom, are you placing your faith?
I ask because I'm interested. I have no ulterior motive.
Thank you for your respectfulness.
"Faith merchants" is Mythra's (another member on that forum) term. I assume he means evangelists or people who want to convert nonChristians to their own faith.
I don't know if anyone agrees with me, religious or otherwise, but I think faith the way I use it in that post is faith or confidence that things will work out in life. When I first started experimenting with the idea of there being no God, the universe seemed so empty. I realized that my very thought structure was programed to accommodate the existence of God. It's a way of thinking, of seeing the world. I decided that is okay; I am too old to change and it doesn't matter. About half a year later I discovered that this has changed. The empty spot is still there but I can now cope with it just fine.
I don't see myself as a child of God anymore. I see myself as part of the universe, like nature and the natural elements and the birds and everything else that exists. This came to me one day during a thunder storm. I was outside taking it all in and it came to me that this is how I "fit in." I have since then read that there are other people who feel this way. I thought that was pantheism, but apparently humanists can feel this way, too. I think perhaps pantheists take it to the level of ritual or some form of religion. I looked into pantheism and it didn't "fit" me.
I don't think anyone or anything is worthy of worship. It's just the way things are. Some things are called trees. Others are called humans. I identify as a human. I am here right now. I will eventually die. Maybe tomorrow. Maybe sooner. Maybe it will be a long time. That is okay. That will be the end. The important thing is that I am happy and true to myself while I am here. When we are true to who we are born to be we naturally live the way all the sages of all the religions--even the wise ones of our own time--tell us to live. If God exists, and if there is an afterlife, God cannot refuse to admit people to heaven. There is no sentient being on earth that would be as cruel as the God that condemns humans to a lake of fire for eternity. That is how I know that that myth cannot possibly be true.
You asked in what my faith is placed. I am not sure. Must there be an object for it? Or is it possible that, like the able-bodied human, we are strong enough to walk on our own? I am thinking of a rather crude analogy. Let's say we live in a time and place where everyone uses walking sticks. It logically follows that if one hand is required to hold onto a walking stick, other means must be devised to carry things. Maybe nobody goes anywhere without a backpack. One person discovers that with a bit of practice he gets along just fine without a walking stick. He can actually balance just fine on his own two legs. This frees up a hand to carry stuff. Which takes a load off his back. Which makes walking easier. Maybe the same applies to faith that we can live life, and that it is okay to die when we can't live anymore.
Does this make sense?